Fury in Russia over the missile launch, but Putin has been mute so far

Fury in Russia over the missile launch, but Putin has been mute so far

President Biden‘s authorization for Ukraine to launch strikes within Russian territory using long-range missiles provided by the United States has elicited an intense backlash from Russia

“The outgoing US president Joe Biden has made a decision deemed one of the most provocative and uncalculated of his administration, a move that could lead to catastrophic consequences,” reported the Russian government newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta on Monday morning.

Leonid Slutsky, a Russian MP and leader of the pro-Kremlin Liberal-Democratic Party has warned that the decision will likely result in a significant escalation, posing severe risks ahead.

Russian senator Vladimir Dzhabarov described the action as “an unprecedented step towards World War Three.”

Indeed, there is a sense of anger present. However, it comes as no significant shock.The pro-Kremlin tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda described the situation as “a predictable escalation.”

The crucial factor lies in the terminology employed by Vladimir Putin and the subsequent reactions from the Kremlin leader.On Sunday night, he remained silent.

However, the president of Russia has made numerous statements in the past.

In recent months, the Kremlin has unequivocally conveyed its stance to the West: refrain from lifting restrictions on the use of long-range weapons and prevent Kyiv from launching strikes deep into Russian territory with these missiles.

In September, President Putin issued a warning that should this situation occur, Moscow would interpret it as the “direct participation” of NATO countries in the conflict in Ukraine.

“This implies that NATO countries conflict with Russia,” he continued.

In the subsequent month, the leader of the Kremlin revealed forthcoming alterations to Russia’s nuclear doctrine, a pivotal document outlining the circumstances that could lead Moscow to consider the use of atomic weapons.

This statement has been broadly understood as yet another indirect warning to both America and Europe regarding the potential consequences of permitting Ukraine to target Russian territory with long-range missiles.

Anticipating Vladimir Putin‘s subsequent actions is a challenging endeavor.

However, he has provided subtle indications.In June, during a gathering with leaders of international news agencies, President Putin faced a question regarding Russia’s potential response to Ukraine being allowed to strike targets within Russian borders using weapons provided by European nations.

Improving air defence systems will be a priority moving forward. “We will be destroying their missiles,” President Putin stated.

Secondly, there is a belief that if there are considerations to provide such weapons to a conflict area aimed at our territory, then why shouldn’t we also supply our weapons of a similar nature to regions globally where they could target critical facilities of the nations engaging in these actions against Russia?”

Moscow has been contemplating equipping Western adversaries to target Western interests overseas.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *